Child Pugh Score Calculator
Calculate the Child-Pugh score to classify chronic liver disease severity. Assess prognosis with bilirubin, albumin, INR, ascites, and encephalopathy.
Medical disclaimer: This calculator is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Results are general estimates and may not reflect your individual circumstances. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Child Pugh Score Calculator
Calculator
Adjust values & calculateEnter your values below. Every result is computed in your browser โ no data is sent to any server.
Formula: Child-Pugh Score = Bilirubin + Albumin + INR + Ascites + Encephalopathy (each 1-3 pts)
Worked example โ Child-Pugh Score: 5, Class A - Well-compensated disease. 1-year survival: ~100%.
Formula
Child-Pugh Score = Bilirubin + Albumin + INR + Ascites + Encephalopathy (each 1-3 pts)
Five clinical parameters are each scored 1-3 points. Total ranges from 5 to 15. Class A: 5-6 (well-compensated), Class B: 7-9 (significant compromise), Class C: 10-15 (decompensated).
Worked Examples
Example 1: Mild Cirrhosis Assessment
Problem:Patient has bilirubin 1.5 mg/dL, albumin 3.8 g/dL, INR 1.2, no ascites, no encephalopathy.
Solution:Bilirubin 1.5 (< 2): 1 point Albumin 3.8 (> 3.5): 1 point INR 1.2 (< 1.7): 1 point Ascites none: 1 point Encephalopathy none: 1 point Total = 5 points
Result:Child-Pugh Score: 5, Class A - Well-compensated disease. 1-year survival: ~100%.
Example 2: Advanced Cirrhosis with Complications
Problem:Patient has bilirubin 4.2 mg/dL, albumin 2.5 g/dL, INR 2.5, moderate ascites, grade III encephalopathy.
Solution:Bilirubin 4.2 (> 3): 3 points Albumin 2.5 (< 2.8): 3 points INR 2.5 (> 2.3): 3 points Ascites moderate/severe: 3 points Encephalopathy grade III-IV: 3 points Total = 15 points
Result:Child-Pugh Score: 15, Class C - Decompensated disease. 1-year survival: ~45%.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Child-Pugh score and what is it used for?
The Child-Pugh score (also called the Child-Turcotte-Pugh or CTP score) is a clinical classification system used to assess the severity of chronic liver disease, particularly cirrhosis. Originally developed by Child and Turcotte in 1964 and later modified by Pugh in 1973, it evaluates five clinical measures: total bilirubin, serum albumin, prothrombin time (INR), presence of ascites, and hepatic encephalopathy. Each parameter receives 1 to 3 points, yielding a total score from 5 to 15. Patients are then classified into Class A (5-6 points, well-compensated), Class B (7-9 points, significant compromise), or Class C (10-15 points, decompensated disease). This score guides treatment decisions and transplant evaluation.
How is each component of the Child-Pugh score graded?
Each of the five parameters is scored 1, 2, or 3 points. Bilirubin: less than 2 mg/dL scores 1 point, 2-3 mg/dL scores 2, and greater than 3 mg/dL scores 3. Albumin: greater than 3.5 g/dL scores 1, 2.8-3.5 scores 2, and less than 2.8 scores 3. INR (or prothrombin time): less than 1.7 scores 1, 1.7-2.3 scores 2, and greater than 2.3 scores 3. Ascites: absent scores 1, mild or controlled with diuretics scores 2, and moderate to severe or refractory scores 3. Hepatic encephalopathy: none scores 1, grade I-II (mild) scores 2, and grade III-IV (severe) scores 3. The sum of all five components gives the total Child-Pugh score.
What do the Child-Pugh classes mean for patient prognosis?
Child-Pugh classification provides important prognostic information for patients with chronic liver disease. Class A (5-6 points) indicates well-compensated cirrhosis with near-normal liver function, a one-year survival rate of approximately 100%, and perioperative mortality around 10%. Class B (7-9 points) represents significant functional compromise with one-year survival of 81% and perioperative mortality around 30%. Class C (10-15 points) indicates decompensated disease with one-year survival of only 45% and perioperative mortality as high as 82%. These survival estimates help clinicians determine whether patients should be listed for liver transplantation and whether they can safely undergo surgical procedures.
How does the Child-Pugh score compare to the MELD score?
Both the Child-Pugh and MELD (Model for End-Stage Liver Disease) scores assess liver disease severity, but they differ in important ways. MELD uses a continuous numerical scale (6-40) calculated from bilirubin, creatinine, and INR, making it more granular for prioritizing organ allocation. Child-Pugh includes subjective assessments of ascites and encephalopathy, which MELD does not, but this subjectivity can lead to inconsistent scoring between clinicians. MELD has largely replaced Child-Pugh for transplant allocation in the United States since 2002 because it better predicts three-month mortality and eliminates subjective components. However, Child-Pugh remains widely used in clinical trials, surgical risk assessment, and general disease staging.
What are the limitations of the Child-Pugh scoring system?
The Child-Pugh score has several recognized limitations. The subjective grading of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy introduces inter-observer variability; different clinicians may assign different scores to the same patient. The scoring system uses arbitrary cutoff values for laboratory parameters that may not reflect continuous disease severity. It does not account for renal function, which is an important predictor of outcome in advanced liver disease. The equal weighting of all five parameters may not reflect their true prognostic importance. Additionally, the three-class system (A, B, C) groups patients with different prognoses into the same category. For example, a patient with score 7 and one with score 9 are both Class B but may have significantly different outcomes.
What can make the albumin and INR components misleading?
Both are read as markers of hepatic synthetic function, but neither is specific to the liver. Albumin also falls with sepsis and systemic inflammation, urinary losses in nephrotic syndrome, enteric losses and simple dilution from volume expansion, and it is directly raised by albumin infusion given for large-volume paracentesis or hepatorenal syndrome. INR is prolonged by vitamin K deficiency from cholestasis or poor intake and, far more dramatically, by warfarin, which can push a compensated patient into the three-point band. Recording recent infusions and anticoagulants alongside the score prevents misclassification.
How are ascites and encephalopathy graded for this score?
Ascites is scored as absent, mild or readily controlled on diuretics, or moderate to severe and refractory, judged from examination and ultrasound together with the response to diuretic therapy. Encephalopathy is graded by the West Haven criteria, where grades I and II cover altered sleep, mild confusion, asterixis and lethargy, and grades III and IV cover marked somnolence or coma. Both depend on clinical judgement at a single moment, and covert encephalopathy detectable only on psychometric testing is easily scored as absent, which is the main source of inter-observer disagreement.
Why is Child-Pugh class still used in drug labelling when MELD dominates transplant allocation?
Pharmacokinetic studies of hepatic impairment are conventionally organised around Child-Pugh classes A, B and C, so prescribing information for many drugs specifies dose reduction or avoidance by class rather than by a MELD number. The class captures the two things that most alter drug handling in cirrhosis: reduced synthetic and metabolic capacity, reflected in albumin and INR, and portosystemic shunting that lets orally absorbed drug bypass first-pass metabolism. MELD, built from bilirubin, creatinine and INR to rank waiting-list mortality, was never designed for that purpose.
Why does the class predict surgical mortality so strongly?
Advanced cirrhosis stacks several problems that surgery exposes at once: impaired synthesis of clotting factors and thrombocytopenia from hypersplenism increase bleeding, low albumin and portal hypertension promote ascitic leak and poor wound healing, splanchnic vasodilation narrows haemodynamic reserve under anaesthesia, and reduced hepatic reserve makes drug handling and postoperative decompensation unpredictable. That is why perioperative mortality for abdominal surgery rises steeply from class A through class C, and why elective operations in class C are usually deferred pending specialist hepatology assessment.
What counts as decompensation in cirrhosis?
Decompensation is the transition from cirrhosis that is clinically silent to cirrhosis producing overt complications, and the defining events are ascites, variceal haemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy and jaundice. Three of the five Child-Pugh variables track those events directly, which is why the score rises sharply once decompensation begins. The distinction matters because compensated and decompensated cirrhosis have very different survival trajectories and because the first decompensating event is generally the trigger for referral to a transplant service for formal evaluation.
References
Background & Theory
History
Reviewed for accuracy by Rahul Singh, Health & Wellness Specialist ยท Editorial policy
Related Calculators
๐งฎCHADS2 Score Calculator
Calculate the CHADS2 stroke risk score for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
๐งฎCha2ds2-VASc Score Calculator
Calculate CHA2DS2-VASc score for stroke risk stratification in atrial fibrillation patients.
๐งฎHas-Bled Score Calculator
Assess bleeding risk in patients on anticoagulation using the HAS-BLED scoring system.
๐งฎHEART Score Calculator for Chest Pain Risk
Risk-stratify emergency department patients with chest pain using the HEART score.
๐งฎTIMI Risk Score Calculator
Calculate the TIMI risk score for STEMI and UA/NSTEMI patients.
๐งฎWells Score DVT Calculator
Estimate pre-test probability of deep vein thrombosis using the Wells clinical criteria.
๐งฎWells Score PE Calculator
Estimate pre-test probability of pulmonary embolism using the Wells criteria.
๐งฎFramingham Risk Score Calculator
Calculate 10-year cardiovascular disease risk using the Framingham risk assessment model.