Takedown Success Rate Calculator
Calculate takedown success rate with our free tool. See your stats, compare against averages, and track progress over time.
Calculator
Adjust values & calculateBy Takedown Type
Formula
The overall success rate divides total successful takedowns by total attempts. Type-specific rates (single leg, double leg, trip) are calculated independently to identify the most effective technique. Efficiency scoring weights each type by its attempt volume.
Last reviewed: December 2025
Worked Examples
Example 1: MMA Fight Takedown Analysis
Example 2: Wrestling Coach Comparison
Background & Theory
The Takedown Success Rate applies the following established principles and formulas. Sports statistics and performance metrics represent one of the most data-rich domains of applied mathematics available to the general public. Baseball, in particular, has developed an exceptionally dense vocabulary of calculated metrics. Earned run average (ERA) quantifies a pitcher's effectiveness as (earned runs × 9) / innings pitched, normalising performance to a nine-inning standard regardless of how many complete games were pitched. WHIP, or walks and hits per inning pitched, is computed as (walks + hits) / innings pitched and provides a complementary measure of how frequently a pitcher allows baserunners. Batting average, one of the oldest statistics in the sport, is simply hits / at-bats, though more modern metrics such as on-base percentage and slugging percentage have largely supplanted it as primary performance indicators. The NFL passer rating formula is considerably more complex, combining completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdown rate, and interception rate into a composite score scaled to a 0–158.3 range. Golf handicap calculation, now governed by the World Handicap System introduced in 2020, uses a Handicap Differential formula applied to the best 8 of a player's most recent 20 score differentials, with adjustments for course rating and slope. The Elo rating system, originally developed by physicist Arpad Elo for chess ranking in the 1960s, has become a widely adopted framework for competitive ranking in sports ranging from football to table tennis. It updates each player's rating after every match based on the margin of expected versus actual result. In endurance sports, pace calculation converts total time to a per-mile or per-kilometre rate, informing training intensity and race strategy. In cycling, power-to-weight ratio (watts per kilogram) is the primary determinant of climbing performance and is central to both professional race analysis and amateur fitness tracking. Fantasy sports scoring systems synthesise multiple individual statistics into aggregate point totals, requiring participants to understand the relative value of different performance categories across sports.
History
The history behind the Takedown Success Rate traces back through the following developments. Organised athletic competition has roots extending to ancient Greece, where the Olympic Games were held at Olympia beginning around 776 BCE. These early games were embedded in religious observance and civic identity, featuring events such as sprinting, wrestling, and the pentathlon. The codification of modern sport rules accelerated dramatically in 19th century Britain, where industrialisation created both the leisure time and the institutional infrastructure for organised competition. The Football Association formalised the rules of association football in 1863, and similar governing bodies for cricket, rugby, tennis, and athletics followed in subsequent decades. Pierre de Coubertin, a French educator inspired by the English model of sport as character-building, campaigned to revive the Olympic Games as a modern international institution. The first modern Summer Olympics were held in Athens in 1896, establishing the template for international multi-sport competition that has continued to the present. FIFA, the international governing body for association football, was founded in Paris in 1904 with seven member nations. The serious statistical analysis of baseball, later termed sabermetrics, was pioneered by writers and analysts including Bill James beginning in the late 1970s. James self-published his Baseball Abstract annuals starting in 1977, introducing rigorous empirical methods to a domain previously dominated by traditional counting statistics and subjective scouting. His work influenced a generation of analysts and front-office executives. The publication of Michael Lewis's Moneyball in 2003, documenting the Oakland Athletics' 2002 season and their use of on-base percentage and other undervalued metrics, brought sports analytics to mainstream attention. The subsequent analytics revolution reshaped hiring practices and game strategy across professional sports leagues. Fantasy sports, which require participants to engage directly with statistical outputs, grew from a hobby practised by a few thousand enthusiasts in the 1980s into a multi-billion dollar industry by the 2010s, with tens of millions of participants across football, baseball, basketball, and other sports.
Frequently Asked Questions
Formula
Success Rate = (Successful Takedowns / Attempted Takedowns) x 100
The overall success rate divides total successful takedowns by total attempts. Type-specific rates (single leg, double leg, trip) are calculated independently to identify the most effective technique. Efficiency scoring weights each type by its attempt volume.
Worked Examples
Example 1: MMA Fight Takedown Analysis
Problem: In a 3-round fight, a wrestler attempts 12 takedowns (5 singles, 4 doubles, 3 trips). They land 3 singles, 3 doubles, and 1 trip. Calculate success rates.
Solution: Total: 7/12 = 58.3%\nSingle Leg: 3/5 = 60.0%\nDouble Leg: 3/4 = 75.0%\nTrip/Throw: 1/3 = 33.3%\nFailed: 5 attempts\nAttempts per round: 12/3 = 4.0\nBest type: Double Leg at 75.0%
Result: Overall: 58.3% (Advanced) | Best: Double Leg 75.0% | 4.0 attempts/round | Est. 315 sec control time
Example 2: Wrestling Coach Comparison
Problem: Fighter A: 8 attempts, 5 successful (all doubles). Fighter B: 15 attempts, 6 successful (mixed). Who is more efficient?
Solution: Fighter A: 5/8 = 62.5% success rate\nFighter B: 6/15 = 40.0% success rate\nFighter A is more efficient per attempt\nFighter B landed more total takedowns (6 vs 5)\nFighter A estimated control: 225 sec\nFighter B estimated control: 270 sec
Result: Fighter A: 62.5% efficiency (Elite) | Fighter B: 40.0% (Above Avg) but more total takedowns and control time
Frequently Asked Questions
What is takedown success rate and how is it calculated?
Takedown success rate is the percentage of attempted takedowns that result in successfully bringing the opponent to the ground and establishing a dominant position. It is calculated by dividing successful takedowns by total takedown attempts and multiplying by 100. This metric is one of the most tracked statistics in MMA and wrestling because it directly measures a fundamental skill that determines where the fight takes place. A high takedown rate indicates effective wrestling ability that can dictate the pace and location of a fight. In the UFC, FightMetric tracks this statistic for every bout, and career takedown accuracy is a key metric used to evaluate fighter capabilities and predict matchup outcomes.
What is considered a good takedown success rate in MMA?
In professional MMA, takedown success rates vary widely based on fighting style and the quality of opposition. The UFC average hovers around 38 to 42 percent across all fighters. Success rates above 50 percent are considered above average and indicate strong wrestling credentials. Elite wrestlers competing in MMA often maintain rates of 55 to 70 percent. Khabib Nurmagomedov maintained a career rate of approximately 48 percent but his effectiveness was amplified by his chain wrestling and pressure style. Daniel Cormier averaged approximately 44 percent but against elite competition. Context matters significantly because a 35 percent rate against top contenders may be more impressive than a 60 percent rate against lower-ranked opponents with poor takedown defense.
What factors most influence takedown success rate?
Multiple factors significantly affect takedown success rate in competitive settings. Timing and setup are the most critical factors because a well-timed shot off a striking combination succeeds far more often than a telegraphed single entry. Level changes preceding the shot help disguise the takedown attempt. Cage positioning dramatically affects success rates, with takedowns against the cage succeeding approximately 15 to 20 percent more often than open-mat attempts. Physical attributes including strength-to-weight ratio, hip flexibility, and leg drive power all contribute. The quality of opposition is perhaps the most significant variable, as elite takedown defenders can reduce even great wrestlers' success rates below 30 percent. Training volume and specificity in live takedown drilling directly correlate with competitive success rates.
How does takedown defense relate to takedown success rate?
Takedown defense and takedown success rate are inversely related metrics that represent opposite sides of the same exchange. A fighter's takedown defense percentage equals 100 minus the opponent's takedown success rate for that specific matchup. High-level takedown defense combines several skills including sprawling ability, hip defense, underhook fighting, cage positioning, and the ability to wrestle back to the feet after being taken down. In the UFC, fighters with takedown defense above 75 percent are considered elite defenders. Notable defenders like Jose Aldo maintained defense rates above 85 percent throughout their careers. The interaction between a great wrestler's offense and an elite defender creates some of the most compelling matchup analysis in MMA, as it determines whether the fight will be contested standing or on the ground.
Why do takedown attempts against the cage have higher success rates?
Cage-assisted takedowns succeed more frequently than open-mat takedowns for several mechanical and tactical reasons. The cage wall prevents the defender from retreating backward, which is the primary defense against level-change entries. This compression of available defensive space forces the defender to primarily rely on hip sprawling and underhook battles rather than distance management. The cage also provides the attacker with additional leverage to complete takedowns by pinning the opponent against the wall and working trips, lifts, or drags from the clinch position. Studies of UFC statistics show that cage takedowns succeed at rates approximately 45 to 55 percent compared to open-mat success rates of 30 to 40 percent. This explains why skilled wrestlers frequently work to pressure opponents toward the cage before initiating takedown sequences.
What is chain wrestling and how does it affect takedown statistics?
Chain wrestling is the practice of linking multiple takedown attempts together in rapid succession, transitioning between different techniques when initial attempts are defended. A chain wrestling sequence might start with a double leg attempt, transition to a single leg when the opponent defends, move to an ankle pick when the single is sprawled on, and finish with an inside trip from the resulting scramble. This approach dramatically increases overall takedown success rates because defenders must successfully defend multiple consecutive attempts. Studies show that chain wrestlers who attempt 3 or more linked techniques in a sequence have approximately 25 to 35 percent higher cumulative success rates compared to single-attempt wrestlers. Khabib Nurmagomedov exemplified chain wrestling by maintaining relentless pressure with multiple technique transitions.
References
Reviewed by Sher, Sports Science & Nutrition Specialist · Editorial policy