Timed Up and Go Calculator
Calculate timed up go quickly with our army & fitness tool. Get results based on evidence-based formulas with clear explanations.
Medical disclaimer: This calculator is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Results are general estimates and may not reflect your individual circumstances. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health.
Timed Up and Go Calculator
Calculator
Adjust values & calculateEnter your values below. Every result is computed in your browser — no data is sent to any server.
Formula: TUG Score = Time (seconds) from seated to walk 3m, turn, walk back, sit
Worked example — Normal for Older Adults | Within her 8-13s age norm | 0% fall risk | Mostly Independent | ~0.82 m/s | 42nd percentile for age
Formula
TUG Score = Time (seconds) from seated to walk 3m, turn, walk back, sit
The TUG test measures the time in seconds for a person to rise from an armchair, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down. Scores are compared against age-adjusted normative values to assess mobility and fall risk.
Worked Examples
Example 1: Community-Dwelling Older Adult (in range)
Problem:A 75-year-old woman completes the TUG test in 11 seconds without an assistive device and with no fall history. What does the calculator show?
Solution:Inputs: time = 11s, age = 75, no device, no fall history Step 1 - Risk category: 11s is >=10 and <14, so "Normal for Older Adults" Step 2 - Age norm band (70-79): 8-13 seconds; 11 is inside this range -> Within Normal Step 3 - Fall risk %: base is 0% because 11s < 14s trigger; no device or history added -> 0% Step 4 - Independence level: 11s < 20s -> "Mostly Independent" Step 5 - Est. walk speed: 6m / 11s = 0.55 m/s, x1.5 sit-stand adjustment = 0.82 m/s Step 6 - Age percentile: 11s sits between the band midpoint (10.5s) and the upper bound (13s) -> 42nd percentile
Result:Normal for Older Adults | Within her 8-13s age norm | 0% fall risk | Mostly Independent | ~0.82 m/s | 42nd percentile for age
Example 2: Post-Fall, Walker-Assisted Assessment (above norm)
Problem:An 80-year-old man using a walker completes the TUG in 24 seconds with a fall in the past year. What does the calculator show?
Solution:Inputs: time = 24s, age = 80, uses walker, fall history = yes Step 1 - Risk category: 24s is >=20 and <30, so "High Fall Risk" Step 2 - Age norm band (80-89): 9-16 seconds; 24 is above the upper bound -> Outside Normal Step 3 - Fall risk %: base = 10 + (24-14) x 3 = 40%; +15% for fall history = 55%; +10% for walker = 65% Step 4 - Independence level: 24s is >=20 and <30 -> "Requires Some Assistance" Step 5 - Est. walk speed: 6m / 24s = 0.25 m/s, x1.5 = 0.38 m/s Step 6 - Age percentile: 24s is more than 5s past the upper bound (16s) -> floor of 1st, computed value rounds to 2nd
Result:High Fall Risk | 8 seconds above his 9-16s age norm | 65% fall risk | Requires Some Assistance | ~0.38 m/s | 2nd percentile for age
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a good Timed Up and Go score for my age?
It depends on the age band Timed Up and Go Calculator uses to judge you: under 60, aim for 6-9 seconds; 60-69, 7-11 seconds; 70-79, 8-13 seconds; 80-89, 9-16 seconds; 90+, 10-20 seconds. These bands are the same ranges commonly cited in geriatric physical therapy references and roughly track the pooled averages reported in Bohannon's 2006 meta-analysis (about 8.1s for ages 60-69, 9.2s for 70-79, and 11.3s for 80-99, across mixed community-dwelling samples). Falling inside your age band on Timed Up and Go Calculator means your time is unremarkable for your age group, not necessarily 'perfect' — TUG is a screening cutoff, not a fitness score.
What does a TUG score of 12+ seconds mean?
A score of 12 seconds or more is the cutoff the CDC's STEADI (Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths & Injuries) initiative uses to flag an older adult as being at increased risk of falling and in need of a fuller fall-risk workup. Note that the bands on this page are wider than that single cutoff: it labels 10 to 13.9 seconds 'Normal for Older Adults', starts the 'Moderate Fall Risk' band at 14 seconds, and only begins raising its fall-risk percentage from 14 seconds. So a time between 12 and 14 seconds will look unremarkable here while still meeting the STEADI threshold for a fuller assessment. A single 12-15 second result is not a diagnosis — it is a prompt to look at gait, strength, medications, vision, and home hazards more closely.
How is the 'fall risk %' on Timed Up and Go Calculator calculated?
It is a transparent heuristic, not a validated clinical prediction model: the calculator starts fall risk at 0% for any TUG under 14 seconds, then adds 3 percentage points for every second above 14 (capped at 95%), then adds +15 points if you report a fall in the past year and +10 points if you use a cane, walker, or other assistive device. So a 20-second TUG with no other risk factors scores 28% (10 + 6x3), while the same 20 seconds plus a fall history and a walker scores 53%. Treat the number as a relative severity indicator to compare scenarios, not as a published probability of falling — for a validated statistical estimate you would need a tool built on a specific outcome study, such as Shumway-Cook's 13.5-second cutoff analysis.
TUG vs. Berg Balance Scale vs. 30-second chair stand — which fall-risk test should I use?
They measure overlapping but different things and are meant to be used together, not as substitutes. TUG measures functional mobility end-to-end (rising, walking, turning, sitting) in under a minute with zero equipment beyond a chair and a stopwatch. The Berg Balance Scale is a longer, 14-item battery that isolates static and dynamic balance components and is more sensitive to subtle balance deficits. The 30-second chair stand measures lower-body strength and power in isolation. Clinicians commonly pair TUG with the Berg Balance Scale and a 4-stage balance test because each one catches different failure modes — a person can have normal strength but poor turning balance, for example, and TUG alone may not distinguish why a score is high.
Can I do the Timed Up and Go test at home without a clinician?
Yes — TUG was designed to need only a standard armchair with arms, a stopwatch or phone timer, a clear 3-meter (about 10-foot) path marked on the floor, and comfortable, non-slip shoes. Sit fully back in the chair, start the timer on 'go,' stand up, walk at your normal comfortable pace to the 3-meter mark, turn around, walk back, and sit down again; stop the timer when your back touches the chair. Do one untimed practice run first so the instructions don't confuse the timed attempt. That said, a single home result should not replace a clinical fall-risk assessment if you have already had a fall, feel unsteady, or are recovering from surgery — share the number with your physical therapist or physician rather than self-diagnosing from it.
How accurate is the TUG test at predicting falls?
Accuracy estimates vary a lot by study size and population, and clinicians are cautioned not to over-trust a single cutoff. The original small study by Shumway-Cook et al. (2000, n=30) reported roughly 87% sensitivity and 87% specificity for a 13.5-second cutoff in identifying people with a fall history. Larger pooled reviews since then, including the 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis by Barry et al. in BMC Geriatrics, found much wider and generally lower accuracy across studies, concluding that TUG alone has limited value as a stand-alone fall predictor in community-dwelling older adults. In practice, TUG is best used as a quick screen that triggers a fuller multifactorial assessment — not as a final answer on its own.
How does the TUG time relate to comfortable gait speed?
The TUG course covers 6 metres of walking, 3 out and 3 back, but the stopwatch also runs during the sit-to-stand, the 180-degree turn, and the sit-down. Dividing 6 metres by the total time therefore understates true walking speed, which is why Timed Up and Go Calculator scales that raw figure upward as a rough allowance for the non-walking phases. If you want a genuine gait-speed measurement, time a straight walk over a marked distance with a running start instead, since gait speed and TUG capture overlapping but not identical aspects of mobility.
What are the dual-task variants TUG-manual and TUG-cognitive?
TUG-manual asks the person to complete the same course while carrying a full cup of water, and TUG-cognitive asks them to count backwards in threes from a randomly chosen number while walking. Both add an attentional load to a task that healthy adults perform largely automatically. A time that lengthens markedly under dual-task conditions suggests walking is consuming more conscious attention than it should, which is informative because real-world walking almost always happens alongside talking, carrying, or scanning the environment.
Why does the 180-degree turn carry so much weight in this test?
Turning is the most demanding segment of the course. It requires anticipatory postural adjustments, a shift of weight onto one limb, sequenced stepping, and coordinated head and trunk rotation while vision is briefly redirected. People with vestibular problems, Parkinsonian gait, or lower-limb weakness often walk in a straight line acceptably but slow sharply or take many small shuffling steps to turn. Watching how the turn is performed, not just the total seconds, is one reason the test is more informative when a clinician observes it.
How should the test be standardised so repeat results are comparable?
Small procedural differences move the number more than most people expect. Use the same armchair with the same seat height and arm rests, the same 3-metre marked path on the same flooring, the same footwear, and the same walking aid, and record which aid was used. Give the instruction to walk at a comfortable usual pace rather than as fast as possible, allow one untimed practice trial, and test at a similar time of day, since fatigue and medication timing both affect mobility. Note any changes alongside the time so a later comparison is interpretable.
References
- Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991
- CDC STEADI Initiative - Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Instructions
- Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the Probability for Falls in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Using the Timed Up & Go Test - Physical Therapy, 2000
- Bohannon RW. Reference Values for the Timed Up and Go Test: A Descriptive Meta-Analysis - Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy, 2006
- Barry E, et al. Is the Timed Up and Go Test a Useful Predictor of Falls in Community Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - BMC Geriatrics, 2014
Background & Theory
Age-adjusted TUG norms used by this calculator
This calculator classifies your result against the same age-banded ranges widely used in geriatric physical therapy references. The table below also shows the independently published pooled averages from Bohannon's 2006 descriptive meta-analysis of community-dwelling adults, so you can see how this tool's bands compare to real study data rather than an arbitrary rule of thumb.
| Age band | This calculator's normal range | Bohannon (2006) pooled mean |
|---|---|---|
| Under 60 | 6-9 seconds | Not separately pooled |
| 60-69 | 7-11 seconds | ~8.1 seconds |
| 70-79 | 8-13 seconds | ~9.2 seconds |
| 80-89 | 9-16 seconds | ~11.3 seconds (80-99 pooled) |
| 90+ | 10-20 seconds | ~11.3 seconds (80-99 pooled) |
How the fall-risk categories map to clinical cutoffs
The CDC's STEADI toolkit uses a single cutoff of 12 seconds or more to flag increased fall risk, which is why this calculator's "Moderate Fall Risk" band begins at 10 seconds and its numeric fall-risk percentage starts rising from 14 seconds — deliberately erring toward catching borderline cases early. The 13.5-second cutoff studied by Shumway-Cook et al. (2000) sits inside that same "Moderate Fall Risk" band. None of these thresholds are exact — they are population-level screening cutoffs, and individual results should be interpreted alongside gait quality, strength, vision, medications, and fall history.
| TUG time | This calculator's category | Clinical context |
|---|---|---|
| Under 10s | Normal Mobility | Below the CDC STEADI 12s risk cutoff |
| 10-13.9s | Normal for Older Adults | Spans the STEADI 12s cutoff and the Shumway-Cook 13.5s cutoff |
| 14-19.9s | Moderate Fall Risk | Above both common screening cutoffs |
| 20-29.9s | High Fall Risk | Associated with reduced functional independence |
| 30s+ | Very High Fall Risk | Original Podsiadlo & Richardson (1991) threshold for impaired mobility / dependence |
How this calculator estimates fall risk: the percentage shown is a transparent, deliberately simple heuristic built into this tool — not a published statistical model. It starts at 0% below 14 seconds, adds 3 percentage points per second above 14 (capped at 95%), then adds +15 points for a reported fall in the past year and +10 points for assistive-device use. Use it to compare scenarios relative to each other, not as a calibrated probability of falling.
Reviewed for accuracy by Rahul Singh, Health & Wellness Specialist · Editorial policy
Related Calculators
🧮Addiction Calculator
Calculate addiction with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮Alcohol Unit Calculator
Calculate alcohol unit with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮AUDIT-C Calculator
Calculate audit ccalculator with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮AUDIT Full Questionnaire Calculator
Calculate auditfull questionnaire with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮AUDIT Score Calculator
Calculate audit score with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮CAGE Questionnaire Calculator
Calculate cagequestionnaire with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮Cigarette Calculator
Calculate cigarette with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮DAST-10 Drug Abuse Screening Calculator
Calculate dast10drug abuse with inputs, formulas, and instant results.