Skip to main content

Fair Value Gap Calculator

Quickly compute fair value gap with accurate formulas. See amortization schedules, growth projections, and side-by-side comparisons.

Skip to calculator
Forex & Trading

Fair Value Gap Calculator

Calculate Fair Value Gap (FVG) ranges, Consequent Encroachment midpoints, and gap size in pips. Free ICT smart money concept FVG calculator for forex traders.

Last updated: December 2025

Calculator

Adjust values & calculate
FVG Direction
Bullish FVG
15.0 pips wide
FVG Range
1.09200 โ€” 1.09350
Consequent Encroachment (CE)
1.09275
50% midpoint โ€” precision entry level

FVG Details

FVG Top1.09350
FVG Bottom1.09200
CE (Midpoint)1.09275
Gap Size0.00150
Size in Pips15.0 pips
Risk Disclaimer: Trading forex involves significant risk of loss. Fair Value Gaps are a technical analysis concept and do not guarantee price will return to these levels. This calculator is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.
Your Result
Bullish FVG: 1.09200โ€“1.09350 | CE: 1.09275 | 15.0 pips
Share Your Result
Understand the Math

Formula

Bullish FVG: Gap = Candle 3 Low โˆ’ Candle 1 High | Bearish FVG: Gap = Candle 1 Low โˆ’ Candle 3 High | CE = (Top + Bottom) / 2

A Fair Value Gap forms when candle 2 creates an impulse move that leaves a gap between candle 1 and candle 3 wicks. For a bullish FVG, the gap exists between candle 1's high and candle 3's low. For a bearish FVG, between candle 1's low and candle 3's high. The Consequent Encroachment (CE) is the exact midpoint of this gap.

Last reviewed: December 2025

Worked Examples

Example 1: Bullish FVG on EUR/USD

Candle 1 high: 1.0920, Candle 3 low: 1.0935. Identify the FVG range and CE level.
Solution:
FVG Top = Candle 3 Low = 1.0935 FVG Bottom = Candle 1 High = 1.0920 FVG Size = 1.0935 - 1.0920 = 0.0015 = 15 pips CE (Midpoint) = (1.0935 + 1.0920) / 2 = 1.09275
Result: Bullish FVG: 1.0920โ€“1.0935 | CE: 1.09275 | 15 pips

Example 2: Bearish FVG on GBP/USD

Candle 1 low: 1.2650, Candle 3 high: 1.2630. Identify the FVG and entry level.
Solution:
FVG Top = Candle 1 Low = 1.2650 FVG Bottom = Candle 3 High = 1.2630 FVG Size = 1.2650 - 1.2630 = 0.0020 = 20 pips CE (Midpoint) = (1.2650 + 1.2630) / 2 = 1.2640
Result: Bearish FVG: 1.2630โ€“1.2650 | CE: 1.2640 | 20 pips
Expert Insights

Background & Theory

The Fair Value Gap Calculator applies the following established principles and formulas. Foreign exchange markets facilitate the conversion of one currency into another and serve as the largest and most liquid financial markets in the world, with daily turnover exceeding seven trillion US dollars. Exchange rates are quoted as currency pairs, expressing the price of one unit of a base currency in terms of a quote currency. For example, a EUR/USD rate of 1.0850 means one euro buys 1.0850 US dollars. The smallest standardized price movement in most pairs is the pip, typically the fourth decimal place, with a value of 0.0001 per unit for USD-denominated pairs. The bid price is the rate at which a dealer will buy the base currency, while the ask price is the rate at which it will sell. The spread between bid and ask represents the dealer's compensation and varies with liquidity and volatility. Leverage amplifies both gains and losses by allowing traders to control positions larger than their deposited margin. A 100:1 leverage ratio means a one-percent adverse move eliminates the entire margin, making position sizing and risk management critical. Two parity conditions from international economics anchor exchange rate theory. Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) holds that exchange rates should adjust over time so that identical goods trade at equivalent prices across countries: S = P_d / P_f, where S is the spot rate and P_d and P_f are domestic and foreign price levels. PPP performs well over long horizons but poorly in the short run due to trade barriers, non-tradable goods, and capital flows. Covered Interest Rate Parity (CIRP) is a near-arbitrage condition stating that forward exchange rate premiums or discounts exactly offset interest rate differentials between two currencies: F/S = (1 + r_d) / (1 + r_f). Deviations from CIRP create riskless arbitrage opportunities that traders rapidly eliminate. Uncovered Interest Rate Parity posits that high-yielding currencies should depreciate to offset their interest advantage, though empirical evidence is mixed and the carry trade โ€” borrowing in low-rate currencies to invest in high-rate ones โ€” has generated persistent returns.

History

The history behind the Fair Value Gap Calculator traces back through the following developments. For much of the nineteenth century and early twentieth century, the international monetary system operated under the classical gold standard, under which each participating currency was fixed to a defined weight of gold, making bilateral exchange rates effectively constant. The system provided price stability and facilitated global trade but constrained governments' ability to respond to economic downturns. World War One shattered the gold standard as nations suspended convertibility to finance wartime expenditures. The interwar period saw attempts to restore gold convertibility, most notably the British return to the gold standard in 1925 at the pre-war parity, a decision criticized by John Maynard Keynes as deflationary. The Great Depression forced widespread currency devaluations and the effective collapse of the international gold standard by the early 1930s. The Bretton Woods Conference of July 1944 established a new order in which member currencies were pegged to the US dollar, while the dollar alone was convertible into gold at 35 dollars per troy ounce. The International Monetary Fund and World Bank were created at the same conference to oversee the system. Bretton Woods delivered exchange rate stability during the postwar growth era but came under strain as US deficits and European dollar accumulation outpaced American gold reserves. On August 15, 1971, President Nixon announced the suspension of dollar-gold convertibility โ€” the so-called Nixon Shock โ€” effectively ending the Bretton Woods system. By 1973, major currencies had transitioned to floating exchange rates determined by market supply and demand, a regime that has persisted. On September 16, 1992, hedge fund manager George Soros shorted the British pound against the European Exchange Rate Mechanism constraints, forcing the UK's withdrawal in what became known as Black Wednesday. Electronic trading platforms emerged in the 1990s and 2000s, replacing voice-brokered interbank markets and dramatically reducing transaction costs for institutional and retail participants alike.

Share this calculator

Explore More

Frequently Asked Questions

A Fair Value Gap (FVG) is a three-candle price pattern identified in the Inner Circle Trader (ICT) methodology. It represents an imbalance in price where a strong impulse candle creates a gap between the wicks of the candles on either side of it. Specifically, a bullish FVG forms when candle 3's low is higher than candle 1's high, leaving an unfilled space. Price tends to return to these gaps to rebalance, making them key areas for trade entries. FVGs are visible on all timeframes and are used by smart money concept traders to identify institutional order flow and potential reversal zones.
To trade a bullish FVG, first identify a three-candle pattern where a strong up candle (candle 2) creates a gap between candle 1's high and candle 3's low. Wait for price to retrace back down into the FVG zone. Place a buy limit order at the FVG bottom or at the CE (midpoint) for a more precise entry. Your stop loss should go below the FVG low or below candle 2's low for added protection. Target previous highs, opposing FVGs, or liquidity pools above the market. Always confirm with higher timeframe bias and look for FVGs that align with the overall market structure and order flow direction.
A traditional gap occurs when the market opens at a different price than the previous close, typically over weekends or after major news events. A Fair Value Gap, however, occurs intraday within continuous price action and is defined by the relationship between three consecutive candles. Regular gaps are visible as empty spaces on the chart, while FVGs may not be immediately obvious because candle 2's body and wicks fill the visual space. FVGs represent institutional imbalance and inefficiency in price delivery, whereas regular gaps can be caused by various factors including low liquidity periods. Both tend to get filled, but FVGs are specifically tied to smart money concepts and algorithmic trading behavior.
Not all Fair Value Gaps get filled, but the majority do eventually see price return to them. In ICT methodology, FVGs on higher timeframes (4-hour, daily, weekly) are more significant and more likely to act as magnets for price. FVGs that form during high-impact news events or during killzone times tend to be more reliable. Some FVGs get partially filled (to the CE level) while others get completely filled and even exceeded. The key is to use FVGs in confluence with other ICT concepts like order blocks, liquidity levels, and market structure. A strong trend may leave several unfilled FVGs as price continues in one direction before eventually retracing.
You may use the results for reference and educational purposes. For professional reports, academic papers, or critical decisions, we recommend verifying outputs against peer-reviewed sources or consulting a qualified expert in the relevant field.
All calculations use established mathematical formulas and are performed with high-precision arithmetic. Results are accurate to the precision shown. For critical decisions in finance, medicine, or engineering, always verify results with a qualified professional.
Educational Note: This calculator is provided for educational and informational purposes. Results are based on the formulas and inputs provided. Always verify important calculations independently. NovaCalculator processes calculator inputs client-side; optional analytics follow visitor consent settings. ยฉ 2024โ€“2026 NovaCalculator.

Share this calculator

Formula

Bullish FVG: Gap = Candle 3 Low โˆ’ Candle 1 High | Bearish FVG: Gap = Candle 1 Low โˆ’ Candle 3 High | CE = (Top + Bottom) / 2

A Fair Value Gap forms when candle 2 creates an impulse move that leaves a gap between candle 1 and candle 3 wicks. For a bullish FVG, the gap exists between candle 1's high and candle 3's low. For a bearish FVG, between candle 1's low and candle 3's high. The Consequent Encroachment (CE) is the exact midpoint of this gap.

Worked Examples

Example 1: Bullish FVG on EUR/USD

Problem: Candle 1 high: 1.0920, Candle 3 low: 1.0935. Identify the FVG range and CE level.

Solution: FVG Top = Candle 3 Low = 1.0935\nFVG Bottom = Candle 1 High = 1.0920\nFVG Size = 1.0935 - 1.0920 = 0.0015 = 15 pips\nCE (Midpoint) = (1.0935 + 1.0920) / 2 = 1.09275

Result: Bullish FVG: 1.0920โ€“1.0935 | CE: 1.09275 | 15 pips

Example 2: Bearish FVG on GBP/USD

Problem: Candle 1 low: 1.2650, Candle 3 high: 1.2630. Identify the FVG and entry level.

Solution: FVG Top = Candle 1 Low = 1.2650\nFVG Bottom = Candle 3 High = 1.2630\nFVG Size = 1.2650 - 1.2630 = 0.0020 = 20 pips\nCE (Midpoint) = (1.2650 + 1.2630) / 2 = 1.2640

Result: Bearish FVG: 1.2630โ€“1.2650 | CE: 1.2640 | 20 pips

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Fair Value Gap (FVG) in ICT trading?

A Fair Value Gap (FVG) is a three-candle price pattern identified in the Inner Circle Trader (ICT) methodology. It represents an imbalance in price where a strong impulse candle creates a gap between the wicks of the candles on either side of it. Specifically, a bullish FVG forms when candle 3's low is higher than candle 1's high, leaving an unfilled space. Price tends to return to these gaps to rebalance, making them key areas for trade entries. FVGs are visible on all timeframes and are used by smart money concept traders to identify institutional order flow and potential reversal zones.

How do you trade a bullish Fair Value Gap?

To trade a bullish FVG, first identify a three-candle pattern where a strong up candle (candle 2) creates a gap between candle 1's high and candle 3's low. Wait for price to retrace back down into the FVG zone. Place a buy limit order at the FVG bottom or at the CE (midpoint) for a more precise entry. Your stop loss should go below the FVG low or below candle 2's low for added protection. Target previous highs, opposing FVGs, or liquidity pools above the market. Always confirm with higher timeframe bias and look for FVGs that align with the overall market structure and order flow direction.

What is the difference between a Fair Value Gap and a regular gap?

A traditional gap occurs when the market opens at a different price than the previous close, typically over weekends or after major news events. A Fair Value Gap, however, occurs intraday within continuous price action and is defined by the relationship between three consecutive candles. Regular gaps are visible as empty spaces on the chart, while FVGs may not be immediately obvious because candle 2's body and wicks fill the visual space. FVGs represent institutional imbalance and inefficiency in price delivery, whereas regular gaps can be caused by various factors including low liquidity periods. Both tend to get filled, but FVGs are specifically tied to smart money concepts and algorithmic trading behavior.

Do Fair Value Gaps always get filled?

Not all Fair Value Gaps get filled, but the majority do eventually see price return to them. In ICT methodology, FVGs on higher timeframes (4-hour, daily, weekly) are more significant and more likely to act as magnets for price. FVGs that form during high-impact news events or during killzone times tend to be more reliable. Some FVGs get partially filled (to the CE level) while others get completely filled and even exceeded. The key is to use FVGs in confluence with other ICT concepts like order blocks, liquidity levels, and market structure. A strong trend may leave several unfilled FVGs as price continues in one direction before eventually retracing.

Is my data stored or sent to a server?

No. All calculations run entirely in your browser using JavaScript. No data you enter is ever transmitted to any server or stored anywhere. Your inputs remain completely private.

Why might my result differ from another tool or reference?

Differences typically arise from rounding conventions, the specific version of a formula (for example, simple vs compound interest), or unit inconsistencies between inputs. Check that both tools are using the same formula variant and the same units. The References section links to the authoritative source behind the formula used here.

References

Reviewed by Daniel Agrici, Founder & Lead Developer ยท Editorial policy