Grain Size Uniformity Calculator (Cu)
Calculate coefficient of uniformity Cu, coefficient of curvature Cc, and USCS soil classification from grain size distribution parameters D10, D30, D50,
Grain Size Uniformity Calculator (Cu)
Calculator
Adjust values & calculateEnter your values below. Every result is computed in your browser โ no data is sent to any server.
Formula: Cu = D60 / D10; Cc = (D30)^2 / (D10 * D60)
Worked example โ Cu: 20 | Cc: 1.25 | Classification: SW (well graded sand) | k approx 0.01 cm/s
Formula
Cu = D60 / D10; Cc = (D30)^2 / (D10 * D60)
This Grain Size Uniformity Coefficient Calculator computes results from your provided inputs using the calculator's underlying model.
Worked Examples
Example 1: Well-Graded Sand for Structural Fill
Problem:A sieve analysis gives D10 = 0.10 mm, D30 = 0.50 mm and D60 = 2.00 mm. Compute the uniformity coefficient and the coefficient of curvature, and classify the sand under USCS.
Solution:Cu = D60 / D10 = 2.00 / 0.10 = 20 Cc = D30^2 / (D10 x D60) = 0.50^2 / (0.10 x 2.00) = 0.25 / 0.20 = 1.25 USCS requires Cu greater than 6 AND Cc between 1 and 3 for a well-graded sand: 20 > 6 and 1 < 1.25 < 3, so both are satisfied Hazen estimate of permeability k = C x D10^2 with C near 100 cm^-1 s^-1 and D10 in cm: k = 100 x (0.010)^2 = 0.01 cm/s
Result:Cu: 20 | Cc: 1.25 | Classification: SW (well graded sand) | k approx 0.01 cm/s
Example 2: Uniform Beach Sand
Problem:A beach sand gives D10 = 0.12 mm, D30 = 0.15 mm and D60 = 0.18 mm. Classify it and explain why it behaves differently from the well-graded sand above.
Solution:Cu = 0.18 / 0.12 = 1.5 Cc = 0.15^2 / (0.12 x 0.18) = 0.0225 / 0.0216 = 1.04 Cc sits inside the 1 to 3 window, but Cu = 1.5 is far below the threshold of 6, so the USCS well-graded criteria are not both met and the soil classifies as SP, poorly graded sand Every grain is close to 0.15 mm, so there are no fines to fill the gaps between the coarse particles. The sand cannot be densified as effectively, and a nearly single-size gradation is the classic condition for piping and internal erosion under seepage.
Result:Cu: 1.5 | Cc: 1.04 | Classification: SP (poorly graded sand) | Uniform gradation, piping risk
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the coefficient of uniformity (Cu)?
The coefficient of uniformity Cu is the ratio of D60 to D10, where D60 is the grain diameter at which 60% of the soil by weight is finer, and D10 is the diameter at which 10% is finer. Cu measures the range of grain sizes present in the soil. A Cu value close to 1 indicates a uniform soil with particles of similar size. For sands, Cu greater than or equal to 6 indicates well-graded soil, while for gravels the threshold is Cu greater than or equal to 4. Well-graded soils generally have better engineering properties because smaller particles fill voids between larger ones.
What is the coefficient of curvature (Cc)?
The coefficient of curvature Cc, also called the coefficient of gradation, is calculated as (D30)^2 / (D10 * D60). It measures the shape of the grain size distribution curve between D10 and D60. For a soil to be classified as well-graded, Cc must fall between 1 and 3 in addition to meeting the Cu criterion. A Cc outside this range indicates a gap-graded or skip-graded soil that is missing certain intermediate grain sizes, even if Cu is high. Both Cu and Cc must satisfy their criteria simultaneously for well-graded classification.
How is grain size analysis performed?
Grain size analysis uses two complementary methods. For particles larger than 0.075 mm (retained on No. 200 sieve), mechanical sieve analysis is performed by passing soil through a stack of sieves with progressively smaller openings and weighing the retained material on each sieve. For particles finer than 0.075 mm, hydrometer analysis uses Stokes law to determine particle sizes from their settling velocity in a water suspension. The combined results produce the grain size distribution curve, from which D10, D30, D50, and D60 values are read.
Why does grain size distribution matter in geotechnical engineering?
Grain size distribution affects virtually every engineering property of coarse-grained soils. Well-graded soils achieve higher compacted densities, have greater shear strength, lower permeability, and less settlement under load compared to uniformly graded soils. The D10 size (effective size) is used to estimate hydraulic conductivity through correlations like the Hazen formula. Grain size distribution is the primary basis for USCS soil classification and directly influences filter design criteria for earth dams, drainage systems, and erosion control.
Why is D10 called the effective size and used for permeability rather than D50?
Flow through a granular soil is throttled by the narrowest pore throats, and those are set by the finer fraction rather than by the median grain. D10, the diameter at which ten percent of the mass is finer, therefore correlates far better with hydraulic conductivity than D50 does. Hazen's approximation is k = C times d10 squared with k in centimetres per second, d10 in centimetres and C near 100, which is equivalent to k in centimetres per second of about 1.0 times D10 in millimetres squared; a clean fine sand with D10 of 0.1 mm therefore gives roughly 0.01 cm/s. It was calibrated on loose clean sands with a low uniformity coefficient and should not be applied to silty or broadly graded material.
How are D10 and D85 used in Terzaghi filter design?
A protective filter has to hold back the base soil while still draining faster than it. Terzaghi's rules state both conditions using percentile diameters: the filter D15 should stay below roughly four to five times the base soil D85, so base particles cannot migrate into the filter voids, and the filter D15 should exceed about four to five times the base D15, so the filter remains substantially more permeable. Filters must also be internally stable, which is why uniformly graded sands and gravels are preferred.
What is internal instability, and which gradations are prone to it?
Internal instability, or suffusion, occurs when the fine fraction of a soil is small enough to wash through the pore network formed by the coarse fraction under seepage, leaving the skeleton intact but progressively more permeable and weaker. Broadly graded and gap-graded materials are the classic candidates, because a missing intermediate size range leaves fines unconstrained by a continuous grain contact chain. A coefficient of curvature outside the 1 to 3 band flags exactly this gap, which is why the criterion is applied alongside the uniformity coefficient.
How does the percentage of fines change the USCS symbol for a sand or gravel?
Fines are the fraction passing the 0.075 mm No. 200 sieve, and their percentage decides which classification branch applies. At five percent or less the soil is clean and takes a single symbol determined purely by gradation, SW or SP for sands and GW or GP for gravels. Above twelve percent the plasticity of the fines governs and the symbol becomes SM or SC, GM or GC. Between five and twelve percent a dual symbol such as SP-SM is required, carrying both gradation and fines information.
Why do well-graded soils compact to a higher dry density?
In a broadly graded material, medium particles occupy the voids between coarse grains and fines occupy what remains, so a greater mass of solids fits into the same total volume. The practical consequences show up in a Proctor compaction test as a higher maximum dry unit weight reached at a lower optimum moisture content, and in the field as a higher friction angle, lower compressibility and lower permeability than a uniform sand of the same mineralogy. This is why specifications for structural fill and road subbase call for graded material.
What is the difference between grading in engineering and sorting in sedimentology?
The two vocabularies run in opposite directions for the same soil. An engineer calls a wide range of sizes well graded because it compacts and performs well; a sedimentologist calls that same material poorly sorted because the depositing current failed to separate the sizes. A uniform beach sand is poorly graded but well sorted. The sorting coefficient shown here is the square root of D60 over D10, whereas Trask's classical sedimentological coefficient uses the quartile ratio D75 over D25, so the two numbers are not interchangeable.
References
Background & Theory
History
Reviewed for accuracy by Daniel Agrici, Founder & Lead Developer ยท Editorial policy
Related Calculators
๐งฎSeismic Reflection Coefficient Calculator
Calculate seismic reflection coefficient with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
๐งฎRunoff Coefficient From Land Use Calculator
Calculate runoff coefficient from land use with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
๐งฎStorage Coefficient Calculator
Calculate storage coefficient with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
๐งฎSurface Runoff Coefficient Calculator
Calculate surface runoff coefficient with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
๐งฎEarth Energy Balance Calculator
Calculate earth energy balance with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
๐งฎBouguer Correction Calculator
Calculate bouguer correction with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
๐งฎCrustal Density Calculator
Calculate crustal density with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
๐งฎCrustal Thickness Calculator (H-k)
Calculate crustal thickness from receiver functions with inputs, formulas, and instant results.