Crustal Thickness Calculator (H-k)
Calculate Moho depth and crustal thickness from teleseismic receiver function Ps delay times, P-wave velocity, and Vp/Vs ratio.
Crustal Thickness Calculator (H-k)
Calculator
Adjust values & calculateEnter your values below. Every result is computed in your browser — no data is sent to any server.
Formula: H = tPs / (sqrt(1/Vs² - p²) - sqrt(1/Vp² - p²))
Worked example — Crustal thickness H = 37.25 km
Formula
H = tPs / (sqrt(1/Vs² - p²) - sqrt(1/Vp² - p²))
Crustal thickness H is calculated from the Ps conversion delay time (tPs), average crustal P-wave (Vp) and S-wave (Vs) velocities, and the teleseismic ray parameter (p). The Vp/Vs ratio determines Vs from Vp.
Worked Examples
Example 1: Continental Crust Estimation
Problem:A seismic station records a Ps delay of 4.5 seconds. Average crustal Vp is 6.3 km/s, Vp/Vs = 1.73, and ray parameter is 0.06 s/km. Calculate crustal thickness.
Solution:Vs = 6.3 / 1.73 = 3.642 km/s termVs = sqrt(1/3.642² - 0.06²) = sqrt(0.07539 - 0.0036) = 0.2679 termVp = sqrt(1/6.3² - 0.06²) = sqrt(0.02520 - 0.0036) = 0.1471 H = 4.5 / (0.2679 - 0.1471) = 4.5 / 0.1208 = 37.25 km
Result:Crustal thickness H = 37.25 km
Example 2: Thin Oceanic Crust
Problem:An ocean-bottom seismometer shows tPs = 1.0 s with Vp = 6.8 km/s, Vp/Vs = 1.80, and p = 0.05 s/km.
Solution:Vs = 6.8 / 1.80 = 3.778 km/s termVs = sqrt(1/3.778² - 0.05²) = sqrt(0.07007 - 0.0025) = 0.2600 termVp = sqrt(1/6.8² - 0.05²) = sqrt(0.02163 - 0.0025) = 0.1384 H = 1.0 / (0.2600 - 0.1384) = 1.0 / 0.1216 = 8.22 km
Result:Crustal thickness H = 8.22 km (typical oceanic crust)
Frequently Asked Questions
What are receiver functions in seismology?
Receiver functions are time series computed from teleseismic earthquake recordings that isolate the response of Earth structure directly beneath a seismometer. They are created by deconvolving the vertical component from the radial (or transverse) component of a three-component seismogram. This process removes the effects of the earthquake source and instrument response, leaving only the P-to-S converted waves and their reverberations generated at subsurface discontinuities such as the Moho. The most prominent phase in a receiver function is the Ps conversion at the crust-mantle boundary, which arrives after the direct P wave by a time delay that depends on crustal thickness and seismic velocities.
How is crustal thickness calculated from receiver functions?
Crustal thickness is calculated from the time delay between the direct P-wave arrival and the P-to-S (Ps) converted phase at the Mohorovicic discontinuity. The fundamental equation is H = tPs / (sqrt(1/Vs^2 - p^2) - sqrt(1/Vp^2 - p^2)), where H is crustal thickness, tPs is the Ps delay time, Vs and Vp are average crustal S-wave and P-wave velocities, and p is the ray parameter. Additional constraints come from the PpPs and PsPs+PpSs reverberation phases, which provide independent thickness estimates. The H-kappa stacking method by Zhu and Kanamori (2000) simultaneously estimates both crustal thickness (H) and Vp/Vs ratio (kappa) by stacking amplitudes at predicted arrival times.
What is the Vp/Vs ratio and why is it important?
The Vp/Vs ratio (often denoted kappa or k) is the ratio of P-wave velocity to S-wave velocity in the crust. It is directly related to Poisson's ratio, which describes how a material deforms under stress. For typical continental crust, Vp/Vs ranges from about 1.65 to 1.85, with 1.73 being a common average corresponding to a Poisson's ratio of 0.25. Higher Vp/Vs ratios (above 1.80) may indicate the presence of partial melt, fluids, or mafic composition in the crust. Lower ratios (below 1.70) suggest felsic or quartzose compositions. The Vp/Vs ratio significantly affects the calculated crustal thickness, so accurate determination of this parameter is critical for reliable Moho depth estimates.
What is the ray parameter and how does it affect the calculation?
The ray parameter (p), also called the horizontal slowness, describes the geometric path of a seismic wave through the Earth. It is defined as p = sin(i)/v, where i is the angle of incidence and v is the velocity at that point. For teleseismic P waves used in receiver function analysis, the ray parameter typically ranges from about 0.04 to 0.08 s/km, corresponding to epicentral distances of roughly 30 to 90 degrees. Smaller ray parameters mean steeper incidence angles and come from more distant earthquakes. The ray parameter affects the timing of converted phases and reverberations, and thus the calculated crustal thickness. Using an incorrect ray parameter can introduce systematic errors of several kilometers in thickness estimates.
What is the Mohorovicic discontinuity (Moho)?
The Mohorovicic discontinuity, commonly called the Moho, is the boundary between the Earth's crust and the underlying mantle. It was discovered in 1909 by Croatian seismologist Andrija Mohorovicic, who observed a distinct change in seismic wave velocities at this boundary. The Moho typically lies at depths of 25 to 70 kilometers beneath continents and 5 to 10 kilometers beneath ocean floors. Across this boundary, P-wave velocities increase abruptly from about 6.5 to 7.0 km/s in the lower crust to 7.8 to 8.2 km/s in the upper mantle. This velocity contrast generates the P-to-S conversions and reverberations that are the basis of receiver function analysis. The depth to the Moho varies significantly with tectonic setting.
What are the PpPs and PsPs+PpSs multiples and why are they worth picking?
They are crustal reverberations: energy that bounces off the free surface and the Moho before reaching the station. Their timings combine the same slownesses differently — H = tPpPs / (termVs + termVp) and H = tPsPs / (2·termVs) — so each gives an independent thickness estimate. Because the depth and the velocity ratio trade off in opposite senses across these phases, stacking all three is what lets H-kappa analysis resolve thickness and Vp/Vs separately instead of only their combination.
How much does an error in Vp/Vs shift the estimated Moho depth?
Substantially, because Vs is derived as Vp divided by kappa. With Vp = 6.3 km/s, p = 0.06 s/km and a Ps delay of 4.5 s, kappa = 1.73 yields about 37 km, while kappa = 1.78 yields about 35 km — roughly 2 km of change for a 0.05 shift. That is why a fixed textbook kappa should never be assumed for a station in unusual crust, and why the multiples are picked wherever the signal-to-noise ratio permits.
Why is the receiver function computed by deconvolving the vertical component?
The vertical component is dominated by the direct P arrival and therefore carries the earthquake's source time function and the instrument response. Dividing the radial trace by it — in practice using water-level spectral division or iterative time-domain deconvolution — cancels those common factors and leaves only the local P-to-S conversion sequence. A Gaussian low-pass parameter is applied to stabilise the result, and that choice sets the effective bandwidth and hence how sharply a thin or gradational Moho can be resolved.
Why do sedimentary basins make receiver functions hard to interpret?
A low-velocity sedimentary layer produces its own strong P-to-S conversion and a train of shallow reverberations that repeat every few seconds. These arrive in the same window as the Moho Ps and its multiples, and can be larger in amplitude, so an automated pick may lock onto a basin phase and return a badly wrong depth. Stations on thick basin fill usually need the sedimentary layer modelled and stripped, or a resonance-removal filter applied, before H-kappa stacking is meaningful.
What does the transverse component reveal that the radial one does not?
For a flat, isotropic, horizontally layered crust the transverse receiver function should be near zero. Coherent transverse energy therefore signals that the assumption has failed: a dipping interface or anisotropy with a tilted symmetry axis produces conversions whose amplitude and polarity vary systematically with back-azimuth. Sorting receiver functions by back-azimuth and inspecting that pattern is the standard diagnostic, and where a dipping Moho is confirmed, the single flat-layer formula gives a biased thickness.
References
Background & Theory
History
Reviewed for accuracy by Daniel Agrici, Founder & Lead Developer · Editorial policy
Related Calculators
🧮Crustal Density Calculator
Calculate crustal density with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮Elastic Moduli Converter (e, G, K, Ν)
Calculate elastic moduli converter (e, g, k, ν) with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮Heat Flow from Gradient Calculator
Calculate heat flow from gradient and conductivity with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮Declination & Inclination Calculator
Calculate magnetic declination & inclination from coordinates with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮Rock Density From Porosity Calculator
Calculate rock density from porosity with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮Groundwater Recharge Rate Calculator
Calculate recharge rate from water level decline with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮Runoff Coefficient From Land Use Calculator
Calculate runoff coefficient from land use with inputs, formulas, and instant results.
🧮Air Density From T & P Calculator
Calculate air density from t & p with inputs, formulas, and instant results.